Down Selection Criteria and MDs Prior to LS3
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5170/CERN-2015-002.232Keywords:
LHC, performance, Chamonix.Abstract
The operation of the LHC and the machine studies conducted during run I have provided important input for the validation of some of the choices that are at the base of the HL-LHC upgrade scenario but it has evidenced also some potential limitations. Progress has been done in their understanding but some open points remain that need to be further studied to consolidate the operational scenario and performance (e.g. stability during the squeeze and collision process, electron cloud effects with 25 ns beams). Some of the solution proposed for the HL-LHC nominal scheme like the operation of crab cavities has not been tested in hadron machines so far and possible alternative solutions have been proposed (e.g. the implementation of long range wire compensators). The required validation studies and the possible criteria for the validation and down-selection of these options will be outlined.Downloads
Published
2016-02-02
Issue
Section
Article
License
Authors who publish with this publication agree to the following terms:
- CERN retains copyright and publishes the work licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this series.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for distribution of the published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this series.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (SeeĀ The Effect of Open Access).