Caramba!! Pancho Villa and the Mexican Innovation Hat


  • AA VV



CERN IdeaSquare, creativity, innovation process


At IdeaSquare and CERN, we are constantly on the look-out for sources of inspiration to make our science better and to make orders-of-magnitude jumps in the process, as well. This time around, we take a closer look at Pancho Villa and his Mexican Hat and see how that could explain the relationship between creativity vs. structure in the innovation process.


Boisot, M. 1995. Information Space: A framework for learning in organizations, institutions and culture. Routledge: London.

Boisot, M., 1999. The I-Space: a framework for analysing the evolution of social computing". Technovation. 19 (9): 525–536.

Boisot, M., Nordberg, M., Yami, S., Nicquevert, B. 2011. Collisions and Collaborations. OUP : Oxford.

Buijs. 2003. “Modelling Product Innovation Processes, from Linear Logic to Circular Chaos”. Creativity and Innovation Management. 12 (2): 76-93.

Chirumalla, K.2017. “Clarifying the feedback loop concept for innovation capability: A literature review”. XXVIII ISPIM Innovation Conference – Composing the Innovation Symphony, Austria, Vienna on 18-21 June 2017: 1-19.

Darbellay, F., Moody Z., Lubart, T. Creativity, Design Thinking and Interdisciplinarity. Springer: Singapore.

Epstein, S., Pacini, R., Denes-Raj, V., Heier, H. 1996. ”Individual differences in intuitive–experiential and analytical–rational thinking styles”. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71 (2): 390-405.

Garcia Tello, P. 2021. Introduction to the P-Space. Mimeo, in preparation.

Geen, R. G. 1995. Human motivation: A social psychological approach. Thomson Brooks/Cole Publishing Co.

Kimbell, L. 2012. Rethinking Design Thinking: Part II, Design and Culture, 4:2, 129-148.

Hassi, L. et al., 2016, Mixing Design, Management and Engineering Students in Challenge-Based Projects”. In: 12th International CDIO Conference Proceedings, ed. Bjorkqvist et al., Turku University, ISSN 2002-1593:630-645.

Kurikka, J., Utriainen, T, 2014, Container Challenge – Prototyping Distributed Collaboration, International Conference on Engineering and Product Design Education. September 4-5, 2014. Twente, NL: 1-6.

Kurikka, J., Utriainen, T. M., & Repokari, L, 2016, Challenge based innovation: translating fundamental research into societal applications, International Journal of Learning and Change, 8(3-4), 278-297.

Leifer, L. J., & Steinert, M., 2011, Dancing with ambiguity: Causality behavior, design thinking, and triple-loop-learning. Information Knowledge Systems Management ;10 (1-4):151-173.

Liedka, J., 2015, Perspective: Linking Design Thinking with Innovation Outcomes through Cognitive Bias Reduction, Journal of Product Innovation Management. 32 (6):925–938.

McCarthy, M., 2010, Experiential Learning Theory: From Theory To Practice, Journal of Business & Economics Research (JBER), 8(5).

Rosenblueth, A., Wiener, N., Bigelow, J., 1943, Behavior, Purpose and Teleology, Philosophy of Science. 10 (1): 18-24.

Saggar, M. et al., 2017, Changes in Brain Activation Associated with Spontaneous Improvization and Figural Creativity After Design-Thinking-Based Training: A Longitudinal fMRI Study, Cerebral Cortex 27 (7): 3542–3552.

Savory, C., 2006, Translating knowledge to build technological competence, Management Decision. 44 (8): 1052–1075.

Sheffi, Y., 2004, RFID and the Innovation Cycle, The International Journal of Logistics Management. 15 (1): 1-10.

Stickdorn, M., Hormess M.E., Lawrence A., Schneider J., 2018, This is Service Design. O’Reilly: Sebastopol, CA.

Utriainen, T., 2017, Perceived difficulty of design thinking activities in co-located and remote environments. CERN IdeaSquare Journal of Experimental Innovation, 1 (1), 21.




How to Cite

VV, A. (2023). Caramba!! Pancho Villa and the Mexican Innovation Hat. CERN IdeaSquare Journal of Experimental Innovation, 7(1), 36–42.