The Importance of an Inclusive Technology Transfer Office Culture in Linking University and Industry
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.23726/cij.2025.1571Keywords:
organizational culture, technology transfer office, innovation, collaborationAbstract
Cultural differences among the stakeholders in the university-industry collaboration space are highlighted as one of the most important barriers in the technology transfer (TT) process. The Technology Transfer Office (TTO) emerges as an important institution to deal with them. Based on a systematic literature review, this study identifies research addressing both topics: TTO and culture. It analyses, through a case study, the main characteristics of the organizational culture of a well-established and successful TTO using the Competing Values Framework. Results show that only limited scientific work emphasizes the nature of organizational culture of the TTO. In addition, the empirical findings show that the culture of the TTO should be an inclusive one comprising an interrelated and ambiguous set of cultural characteristics that embrace the culture of its various stakeholders in a pragmatic, professional, and service-oriented manner. In doing so the TTO bridges information and interpretation asymmetries among them.
References
Allen, T.J. (1977), Managing the flow of technology, The MIT Press.
Baglieri, D., Baldi, F. and Tucci, C.L. (2018), University technology transfer office business models: one size does not fit all, Technovation, Vols 76-77, SI, pp. 51-63.
Bengoa, A., Maseda, A., Iturralde, T. and Aparicio, G. (2021), A bibliometric review of the technology transfer literature, Journal of Technology Transfer, Vol. 46 No. 5, pp. 1514-1550.
Thorsten Büschgens, T., Bausch, A., David B. Balkin, D. B. (2013) Organizational culture and innovation: a meta-analytic review, Journal of Product Innovation Management, Vo.30, No. 4, pp. 763-781.
Cameron, K. S. and Quinn, R. E. (2006), Diagnosing and changing organizational culture: based on the competing values framework, John Wiley & Sons, Inc. San Francisco.
Compagnucci, L and Spigarelli, F. (2024) Improving knowledge transfer and innovation services: A roadmap for Knowledge Transfer Offices, Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 9 (4). 100577.
Galan-Muros, V. and Plewa, C. (2016), What drives and inhibits university-business cooperation in Europe? A comprehensive assessement, R&D Management, Vol. 46 No. 2, pp. 369-382.
Gambi, L.D.N. and Debackere, K. (2024), A literature-based view on technology transfer and culture, Benchmarking: An International Journal, Vol. ahead-of-print No. ahead-of-print. (DOI: 10.1108/BIJ-03-2023-0133)
Gopalakrishnan, S. and Santoro, M.D. (2004), Distinguishing between knowledge transfer and technology transfer activities: the role of key organizational factors, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, Vol. 51 No. 1, pp. 57-69.
Grzegorczyk, M. (2019), The role of culture-moderated social capital in technology transfer – insights from Asia and America, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Vol. 143, pp. 132-141.
Huyghe, A. and Knockaert, M. (2015), The influence of organizational culture and climate on entrepreneurial intentions among research scientists, Journal of Technology Transfer, Vol. 40 No. 1, pp. 138-160
Huyghe, A., Knockaert, M., Wright, M. & Piva, E. (2014). Technology transfer offices as boundary spanners in the pre-spin-off process: the case of a hybrid model. Small Business Economics, Vol. 43 No.2, pp. 289-307
Kuhn, S., & Bhatiasevi, V. (2024). The Impact of Organizational Culture on the Innovation and Performance of SMEs: A Comparative Study between Germany and Thailand. Global Business Review. https://doi.org/10.1177/09721509241246558.
Magistretti, S., Sanasi, S. Dell’Era, C. & Ghezzi, A. (2023) Entrepreneurship as design: A design process for the emergence and development of entrepreneurial opportunities. Creativity and Innovation Management. Vol.32, No. 1, pp. 5-21.
Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J. and Altman, D.G. and Prisma Group. (2009), Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement, PLoS Medicine, Vol. 6 No. 7, pp. 1-6.
O’Kane, C. (2018), Technology transfer executives' backwards integration: An examination of interactions between university technology transfer executives and principal investigators, Technovation, Vols 76–77, pp. 64-77
Pohlmann, J. R., Ribeiro, J. L. D. and Marcon, A. (2024) Inbound and outbound strategies to overcome technology transfer barriers from university to industry: a compendium for technology transfer offices, Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, Vol. 36, No. 6, pp.1166-1178.
Quinn, R. and Rohrbaugh, J.A. (1983), Spatial model of effectiveness criteria: towards a competing values approach to organizational analysis, Management Science, Vol.29, No. 3, pp. 363-377.
Resende, D.N, Gibson, D. and Jarrett, J. (2013). BTP—Best Transfer Practices. A tool for qualitative analysis of tech-transfer offices: A cross cultural analysis, Technovation, Vol.33, No. 1, pp. 2-12.
Siegel, D.S., Waldman, D. and Link, A. (2003a), Assessing the impact of organizational practices on the relative productivity of university technology transfer offices: an exploratory study, Research Policy, Vol. 32 No. 1, pp. 27-48.
Schein, E.H. (1984), Coming to a new awareness of organizational culture, Sloan Management Review, Vol. 25 No. 2, pp. 3-16.
Siegel, D.S., Waldman, D.A., Atwater, L.A. and Link, A.N. (2003b), Commercial knowledge transfers from universities to firms: improving the effectiveness of university–industry collaboration, The Journal of High Technology Management Research, Vol. 14 No. 1, pp.111-133.
Siegel, D.S., Waldman, D.A., Atwater, L.E. and Link, A.N. (2004), Toward a model of the effective transfer of scientific knowledge from academicians to practitioners: Qualitative evidence from the commercialization of university technologies, Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, Vol. 21 Nos 1-2, pp. 115-142.
Siegel, D.S., Veugelers, R. and Wright, M. (2007), Technology transfer offices and commercialization of university intellectual property: performance and policy implications, Oxford Review of Economic Policy, Vol. 23 No. 4, pp. 640-660.
Steenkamp, R. J. (2023), Technology transfer perspectives: The KU Leuven case study, South African Journal of Industrial Engineering, Vol. 34, No. 2, pp. 49-60.
Uctu, R., & Essop, H. (2022). Technology transfer models of universities and public research organisations in South Africa: changes before and after the IPR-PFRD Act of 2008. Journal of Technology Management & Innovation, 17(1), 71–83.
Vac CS, Fitiu A. (2017). Building Sustainable Development through Technology Transfer in a Romanian University. Sustainability. Vol.9, No.11, 2042.
Yin, R. K. (2018). Case Study Research: Design and Methods, Sixth edition, Los Angeles: SAGE.
Wright, D. (2013). Communication and Cultural Change in University Technology Transfer. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, Vol.43, No.1, pp.79-101.
Zu, X., Robbins, T.L. and Fredendall, L.D. (2010), Mapping the critical links between organizational culture and TQM/six sigma practices, International Journal of Production Economics, Vol. 123 No. 1, pp. 86-106.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Lillian do Nascimento Gambi, Koenraad Debackere
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
