Languaging Co-Creation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.23726/cij.2026.1842Keywords:
abductive reasoning, autopoiesis, bisociation, body-mind dualism, catalysis, choral singing, co-authoring, co-languaging, conscience, consciousness, context, conviviality, co-optimism, co-pessimism, co-semiosis, creative quartets, distributed creativity, entredonneur, emulsifiers, endosynergy, exosynergy, genius, head/hand/heart/humour, relevation, research, search, second-order systems, sympoiesis, artificial intelligenceAbstract
Presented as an alphabetical glossary of concepts and neologisms, this paper depicts human co-creation as a potential global resource for turning existential 'unthinkables' into micro-utopian 'possibles'. Recent archaeological discoveries show the creativity of Homo sapiens to be innate. Also, as language is such a powerful shaper of our shared realities we all have some potential to ‘co-language’ beliefs, assumptions and, therefore, our collective behaviours. While some may find this fanciful, it has precedents. Raphael Lemkin had studied the Ottoman attacks on Armenia in WW1, concluding that they went beyond simple military aggression. He argued that attempts to destroy national or ethnic groups required new legal descriptions. However, only after he created the neologism ‘genocide’ in 1943 did the League of Nations recognise it. This changed international law. This suggests that while we can ‘language’ transitions from the ‘unimaginable’ to the ‘thinkable’, we need a better understanding of its co-creative nature.
References
Bateson, G. (2002). Mind and nature: A necessary unity, p. 134. Hampton.
BBC TV broadcast, 2021 7th October, David MacMillan: ''Being Scottish helped me win Nobel Prize"
Bohm, D. (1995). Wholeness and the Implicate Order. London, Boston and Henley: Routledge and Kegan Paul (first published in 1980).
Cantillon, R. (2017). Essay on the Nature of Commerce in General. Routledge.
Damsgaard, J.B. and Brinkmann, S. (2022). Me and us: Cultivating presence and mental health through choir singing. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences, 36(4): 1134-1142. https://doi.org/10.1111/scs.13078
Duchamp, M. (2022). Salt Seller: The Writings of Marcel Duchamp. Oxford University Press.
Hill, R.A. and Dunbar, R.I. (2003). Social network size in humans. Human Nature, 14(1). 53-72. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12110-003-1016-y
Freud, A. (1967). About losing and being lost. The Psychoanalytic Study of the Child, 22(1): 9-19. https://doi.org/10.1080/00797308.1967.11822587
Heidegger, M. (2010). Being and time. SUNY press.
Horgan, J. (1994). Can science explain consciousness? Scientific American, July, pp. 88-94. https://doi.org/10.1038/scientificamerican0794-88
Ibri, I.A. (2022). The heuristic exclusivity of abduction in Peirce’s philosophy. In Semiotics and Pragmatism: Theoretical Interfaces, pp. 79-96. Cham: Springer International Publishing.
Illich, I., (1975). Tools for Conviviality. New York, Harper & Row.
Koestler, A. (1967). The Ghost in the Machine. Penguin: London (reprint 1990).
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors We Live By. University of Chicago: Chicago and London.
Ljubec, Ž. (2022). Becoming Polyphibious: Metadesigning metamorphosis and other solutions for a world defined by exceptions. In Metadesigning Designing in the Anthropocene, pp. 219-230. Routledge
Lutz, D.W. (2009). African Ubuntu Philosophy and Global Management. Journal of Business Ethics, 84(Suppl 3): 313-328. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-009-0204-z
Maturana, H., & Varela, F. (1980). Autopoiesis and Cognition; the realisation of the Living. In: Boston Studies in Philosophy of Science. Reidel: Boston.
Nancy, J.L. (2000). Being singular plural. Stanford University Press.
Ruskin, J. (1885). The stones of Venice (Vol. 3). John B. Alden.
Sawyer, R.K. and DeZutter, S. (2009). Distributed creativity: How collective creations emerge from collaboration. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 3(2): 81.
Taleb, N. N. (2007). The Black Swan: The Impact of the Highly Improbable. New York: Random House
Wiseman, R. (2003). The Luck Factor. London, UK: Random House.
Wood, J. and Nieuwenhuijze, O., (2006). Synergy and Sympoiesis in the Writing of Joint Papers; anticipation with/in imagination. International Journal of Computing Anticipatory Systems, 18: 347-370.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2026 John Wood
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
