Co-Creating Operational AI Governance

Authors

  • Giorgio Zampirolo Independent Researcher, London, United Kingdom
  • Daria Rudnik Independent Consultant, Tel Aviv, Israel
  • Felicia Burtscher Independent Researcher and Consultant, Berlin, Germany

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.23726/cij.2026.1856

Keywords:

Artificial intelligence, governance, Co-Creation, Design science, Experimental Innovation

Abstract

Formal principles, assigned roles, and controls are necessary components of Artificial Intelligence (AI) governance, but organisations may still struggle to translate them into decision rights and escalation arrangements. This article presents a co-creation protocol designed to support cross-functional actors in converting regulatory and organisational requirements into explicit decision rights, escalation pathways, and revisable artefacts. Design requirements were informed by a prior survey of European AI practitioners; the protocol was developed from professional consulting experience across successive versions used in three engagements. Its current version was completed once, with two documented adaptations. Using process evidence, the study formulates two provisional propositions and identifies further untested design questions. The paper reports observed enactability in one completed, adapted application rather than validated effectiveness, and situates the protocol relative to the EU AI Act and ISO/IEC 42001 as a translation mechanism, not a compliance substitute.

References

Bammer, G. (2019). Key issues in co-creation with stakeholders when research problems are complex. Evidence & Policy, 15(3), 423–435. https://doi.org/10.1332/174426419X15532579188099

Batool, A., Zowghi, D., & Bano, M. (2025). AI governance: A systematic literature review. AI and Ethics, 5, 3265–3279. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-024-00653-w

Birhane, A., Isaac, W., Prabhakaran, V., Díaz, M., Elish, M. C., Gabriel, I., & Mohamed, S. (2022). Power to the people? Opportunities and challenges for participatory AI. Equity and Access in Algorithms, Mechanisms, and Optimization (EAAMO '22), Article 6, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1145/3551624.3555290

Birkstedt, T., Minkkinen, M., Tandon, A., & Mäntymäki, M. (2023). AI governance: Themes, knowledge gaps and future agendas. Internet Research, 33(7), 133–167. https://doi.org/10.1108/INTR-01-2022-0042

Bogucka, E., Constantinides, M., Šćepanović, S., & Quercia, D. (2024). Co-designing an AI impact assessment report template with AI practitioners and AI compliance experts. Proceedings of the AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society, 7(1), 168–180. https://doi.org/10.1609/aies.v7i1.31627

Chandra Kruse, L. (2025). Design principles unveiled: Capturing innovation insights for future design breakthroughs. CERN IdeaSquare Journal of Experimental Innovation, 9(1), 5–8. https://doi.org/10.23726/cij.2025.1582

European Parliament and Council. (2024). Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 laying down harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Artificial Intelligence Act). Official Journal of the European Union.

Head, B. W., & Alford, J. (2015). Wicked problems: Implications for public policy and management. Administration & Society, 47(6), 711–739. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399713481601

Hevner, A. R., March, S. T., Park, J., & Ram, S. (2004). Design science in information systems research. MIS Quarterly, 28(1), 75–105. https://doi.org/10.2307/25148625

ISO/IEC. (2023). ISO/IEC 42001:2023 — Information technology — Artificial intelligence — Management system. International Organization for Standardization.

Lipmanowicz, H., & McCandless, K. (2014). The surprising power of liberating structures: Simple rules to unleash a culture of innovation. Liberating Structures Press.

Mökander, J., & Floridi, L. (2023). Operationalising AI governance through ethics-based auditing: an industry case study. AI and Ethics, 3(2), 451-468. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-022-00171-7

Papagiannidis, E., Mikalef, P., & Conboy, K. (2025). Responsible artificial intelligence governance: A review and research framework. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 34(2), 101885. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2024.101885

Peffers, K., Tuunanen, T., Rothenberger, M. A., & Chatterjee, S. (2007). A design science research methodology for information systems research. Journal of Management Information Systems, 24(3), 45–77. https://doi.org/10.2753/MIS0742-1222240302

Rittel, H. W. J., & Webber, M. M. (1973). Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences, 4(2), 155–169. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01405730

Rogers, P., & Blenko, M. (2006). Who has the D? How clear decision roles enhance organizational performance. Harvard Business Review, 84(1), 52–61.

Romme, A. G. L. (2003). Making a difference: Organization as design. Organization Science, 14(5), 558–573. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.14.5.558.16769

Ruster, L. P., & Daniell, K. A. (2025). How to operationalize responsible use of artificial intelligence. MIS Quarterly Executive, 24(2), Article 6, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.17705/2msqe.00116

Sein, M. K., Henfridsson, O., Purao, S., Rossi, M., & Lindgren, R. (2011). Action design research. MIS Quarterly, 35(1), 37–56. https://doi.org/10.2307/23043488

Sio, U. N., & Ormerod, T. C. (2009). Does incubation enhance problem solving? A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 135(1), 94–120. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014212

van Aken, J. E., & Romme, A. G. L. (2012). A design science approach to evidence-based management. In D. M. Rousseau (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of evidence-based management (pp. 43–57). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199763986.013.0003

von Busch, O., & Palmås, K. (2016). Social means do not justify corruptible ends: a realist perspective of social innovation and design. She Ji: The Journal of Design, Economics, and Innovation, 2(4), 275-287. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sheji.2017.07.002

Zampirolo, G., Burtscher, F., Mariotti, Y., Rudnik, D., & Aderemi-Makinde, M. (2026). The AI governance paradox: Ethical awareness without operational clarity. In R. Kimmons (Ed.), Artificial Intelligence ethics, law, and policy [Working title]. IntechOpen. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.1015694

Downloads

Additional Files

Published

2026-09-16

How to Cite

Zampirolo, G., Rudnik, D., & Burtscher, F. (2026). Co-Creating Operational AI Governance. CERN IdeaSquare Journal of Experimental Innovation, 10(2), 151–156. https://doi.org/10.23726/cij.2026.1856

Issue

Vol. 10 No. 2 (2026): Special Issue on Co-Creation

Section

Part 3: Co-Creating with Machines

Categories

License

Copyright (c) 2026 Giorgio Zampirolo, Daria Rudnik, Felicia Burtscher

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  • Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  • Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  • Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).