Design Thinking and Healthcare Innovation: Notes for Researchers and Practitioners
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.23726/cij.2026.1876Keywords:
Healthcare Innovation and Intrapreneurship, Design ThinkingAbstract
Design thinking has become a valuable tool for conducting research and conducting practical programs of transformation. It has been especially useful in extending the reach of design from its traditional focus on objects to an expanded field of "wicked problems" including corporate strategy, disaster relief, and social policy. As such, it has entered the complex field of healthcare, where design thinking has been adopted by leading medical institutions and affiliated professional associations. These Methodological Notes draw upon research that has led to the formulation of a set of tools that can be adapted by researchers and practitioners preparing to launch transformation projects within their respective institutions. With the understanding that in the complex and dynamic environment of healthcare, one size most definitely does not fit all, we propose an 8-phase design cycle that may serve as a practical guide to preparing, conducting, and evaluating such an initiative.
References
Auernhammer, J. M. (2024). Advancing Design through Science and Research, CERN IdeaSquare Journal of Experimental Innovation, 2024; 8 (2): 4-10. https://doi.org/10.23726/cij.2024.1510
Blank, S. (2019). Why Companies do Innovation theater instead of Actual Innovation? Harvard Business Review, October 2019. https://hbr.org/2019/10/why-companies-do-innovation-theater-instead-of-actual-innovation
Brown, T. (2009/2019). Change by Design: How Design Thinking Transforms Organizations and Inspires Innovation. Harper Collins.
Buchanan, R. (1992). Wicked problems in design thinking. Design Issues 6, pp. 5-21. https://doi.org/10.2307/1511637
Cross, N. (1993). A History of Design Methodology. https://monoskop.org/images/6/66/Cross_Nigel_1993_A_History_of_Design_Methodology.pdf
Cross, N. (2023) Design Thinking: Understanding How Designers Think and Work. Bloomsbury Publishing, London.
Dubberly, H., Mehta, R., Evenson, S., & Pangaro, P. (2010). Reframing health to embrace design of our own well-being. Interactions 17, pp. 56-73. https://doi.org/10.1145/1744161.1744175
IDEO (2011). Human Centered Design Toolkit, 2nd edition.
Jen N. (2017). Design Thinking is Bullshit. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V8gjDsW3lsY
Jones, P. (2013). Design for Care: Innovating Healthcare Experience. Rosenfeld.
Katz, B., Mawer, S., et al. (2025). Healthcare by Design: A Handbook for Changemakers. University of Toronto.
Ku, B. & Lupton, E. (2020), Health Design Thinking: Creating Products and Services for Better Health. Smithsonian.
Martin, R. (2007). The Opposable Mind: How Successful Leaders Win through Integrative Thinking. Harvard Business School.
Mawer, S., et al. (2019). Discovery Design: Design Thinking for Healthcare Improvement. The Risk Authority, Stanford Medicine.
Norman, D., Design Thinking: A Useful Myth (2010). Core77: https://www.core77.com/posts/16790/design-thinking-a-useful-myth-16790 . Norman subsequently revised this assessment: https://jnd.org/rethinking-design-thinking/
Rittel, H. & Webber, M. (1973). Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences, 4 (2), 155-169. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01405730
Simon, H. (1969). The Sciences of the Artificial. MIT Press.
Stanford d.School: https://dschool.stanford.edu/tools/starter-kit
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Barry Katz
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
