Development and piloting of a questionnaire to assess pupils’ attitudes towards climate change
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25321/prise.2024.1455Abstract
Background: Climate change is often regarded not only as the central challenge humanity faces in the 21st century but also as an important topic for geography education in school. In addition, geography is a key subject for education for sustainable development. Constructs that include not only knowledge-related but also motivational and affective factors, such as the attitude construct, are considered to be important prerequisites both for learning and for climate-related behavior. In recent years, several studies have addressed the issue of young people’s attitudes towards climate change. However, to date, no comprehensibly validated measurement instrument exists to assess pupils’ attitudes towards climate change in a differentiated manner with reference to the three dimensions of attitudes (cognitive, affective, behavioral/conative), as well as from a geographic perspective.
Purpose: Therefore, this study describes the development and piloting of a measurement instrument to assess young people’s attitudes towards climate change that is oriented towards the three established dimensions of the attitude construct against a geographical (didactic) background. Furthermore, the instrument should be economically manageable for application in further research and practice—not only in geography didactics.
Design and Methods: After developing an item pool in a structured manner and conducting a two-phase qualitative pretest, we examined the factorial structure of the developed instrument by means of exploratory factor analysis (maximum likelihood analysis with Promax rotation (κ = 4)) of the subsequent main test, also with the aim of identifying particularly suitable items from an initially larger item pool.
Sample/Setting: The exploratory factor analysis was conducted with a sample of N = 163 students at three grammar schools (“Gymnasium”) in Bavaria. Of these, 51.5% (n = 84) identified as female and 45.4% (n = 74) as male (3.1% (n = 5) did not specify their gender). Seventy-four percent (n = 120) of the students attended grade 9 and 25.8% (n = 42) grade 10 (ages 14–17).
Results: Our analyses resulted in a final questionnaire consisting of 22 items in three scales reflecting the three dimensions of the attitude construct—cognitive, affective, and conative attitudes towards climate change—with good reliability values (.825 ≤ α ≤ .904). Medium correlations between the factors (.405 ≤ r ≤ .554) indicated that the scales are one dimensional. Pupils rated their knowledge of climate change (cognitive dimension; M = 5.40, SD = 0.66; 1 = strongly disagree (“trifft gar nicht zu”) to 6 = strongly agree (“trifft voll zu”)) and their climate change concerns (affective dimension; M = 4.08, SD = 1.16) as higher than their willingness to act with regard to adaptation and mitigation of climate change (conative dimension; M = 3.70, SD = 1.11).
Conclusions: The designed questionnaire makes it possible to reliably and validly assess the attitudes of pupils towards climate change in a differentiated way in relation to the cognitive, affective, and conative dimensions of the attitude construct while simultaneously including a wide range of topics. Possible application of the developed instrument in research and practice—for example, by teachers in the (geography) classroom to obtain an overview of students’ learning preconditions or to use the results as a starting point for discussion during a lesson on the topic—are discussed.
Keywords: climate change, attitudes, questionnaire, scale development, geography teaching
Downloads
Additional Files
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 The Author/s
![Creative Commons License](http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by-nc-sa/4.0/88x31.png)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal. The applicable licence is https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/, which means
You are free to:
Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material under the following terms:
Attribution: You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
NonCommercial: You may not use the material for commercial purposes.
ShareAlike: If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (see The Effect of Open Access).