Experimenting with Open Innovation in Science (OIS) practices: A novel approach to co-developing research proposals
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.23726/cij.2021.1328Keywords:
Open Innovation in Science (OIS), co-production of scientific research, co-developing research proposalsAbstract
Co-producing scientific research with those who are affected by it is an emerging phenomenon in contemporary science. This article summarizes and reflects on both the process and outcome of a novel experiment to co-develop scientific research proposals in the field of Open Innovation in Science (OIS), wherein scholars engaged in the study of open and collaborative practices collaborated with the “users” of their research, i.e., scientists who apply such practices in their own research. The resulting co-developed research proposals focus on scientific collaboration, open data, and knowledge sharing and are available as an appendix to this article.
References
Arnott, J.C., Neuenfeldt, R.J., & Lemos, M.C., 2020. Co- producing science for sustainability: can funding change knowledge use? Global Environmental Change, 60: p.101979. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2019.101979
ATTRACT student projects, 2021, https://phase1.attract- eu.com/showroom/student-projects/ (accessed Nov 2021)
Beck, S., Bergenholtz, C., Bogers, M., Brasseur, T.-M., Conradsen, M.L., Di Marco, D., Distel, A.P. Dobusch, L., Dörler, D., Effert, A., Fecher, B., Filiou, D., Frederiksen, L., Gillier, T., Grimpe, C., Gruber, M., Haeussler, C., Heigl, F., Hoisl, K., Hyslop, K., Kokshagina, O., LaFlamme, M., Lawson, C., Lifshitz-Assaf, H., Lukas, W., Nordberg, M., Norn, M. T., Poetz, M.K., Ponti, M., Pruschak, G., Pujol Priego, L., Radziwon, A., Rafner, J., Romanova, G., Ruser, A., Sauermann, H., Shah, S.K., Sherson, J.F., Suess-Reyes, J., Tucci, C.L., Tuertscher, P., Vedel, J.B., Velden,T., Verganti, R., Wareham, J., Wiggins, A., & Xu, S.M., 2020. The Open Innovation in Science research field: a collaborative conceptualisation approach, Industry and Innovation, in press: pp. 1-50. https://doi.org/10.108/13662716.2020.1792274
Beck, S., LaFlamme, M., Bergenholtz, C., Bogers, M., Brasseur, T. M., Conradsen, M. L., Crowston, K., Di Marco, D., Effert, A., Filiou, D., Frederiksen, L., Gillier, T., Gruber, M., Haeussler, C., Hoisl, K., Kokshagina, O., Norn, M. T., Poetz, M. K., Pruschak, G., Pujol Priego, L., Radziwon, A., Ruser, A., Sauermann, H., Shah, S. K., Suess-Reyes, J., Tucci, C. L., Tuertscher, P., Vedel, J. B., Verganti, R., Wareham, J., Xu, S. M. 2021. Examining Open Innovation in Science (OIS): What Open Innovation can and cannot offer the science of science. Innovation: Organization & Management, online first. https://doi.org/10.1080/14479338.2021.1999248
Caron-Flinterman, J.F., Broerse, J.E., & Bunders, J.F., 2005. The experiential knowledge of patients: a new resource for biomedical research? Social Science & Medicine, 60(11): pp. 2575-2584. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2004.11.023
Chambers, J.M., Wyborn, C., Ryan, M.E., Reid, R.S., Riechers, M., Serban, A. & Pickering, T., 2021. Six modes of co- production for sustainability. Nature Sustainability, 4: pp. 983–996. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-021-00755-x
Chu, J. S., & Evans, J. A., 2021. Slowed canonical progress in large fields of science. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118(41): pp. e2021636118. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2021636118
Corin, E. N., Jones, M. G., Andre, T., Childers, G. M., & Stevens, V., 2017. Science hobbyists: Active users of the science-learning ecosystem. International Journal of Science Education, Part B, 7(2): pp. 161-180. https://doi.org/10.1080/21548455.2015.1118664
Dahlander, L., Gann, D.M., & Wallin, M.W., 2021. How open is innovation? A retrospective and ideas forward, Research Policy, 50(4): pp. 104218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2021.104218
Fortunato, S., Bergstrom, C. T., Börner, K., Evans, J. A., Helbing, D., Milojević, S., Petersen, A. M., Radicchi, F., Sinatra, R., & Uzzi, B., 2018. Science of science. Science, 359(6379): pp. eaao0185. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aao0185
Gkeredakis, M., Lifshitz-Assaf, H., & Barrett, M., 2021. Crisis as opportunity, disruption and exposure: exploring emergent responses to crisis through digital technology, Information and Organization, 31(1): pp. 100344. https://doi.org/10.10/j.infoandorg.2021.100344
Goodyear, M., Zechmeister-Koss, I., Christiansen, H., Bauer, A., & Paul, J., 2019, Raising the Village to Raise the Child: Supporting children with a parent with mental illness, Practice Approach Vol. 1, Unpublished practice guide, The Village Research Group.
Guinan, E., Boudreau, K.J., & Lakhani, K.R., 2013. Experiments in Open Innovation at Harvard Medical School: What happens when an elite academic institution starts to rethink how research gets done?, MIT Sloan Management Review, 54(3): pp. 45-51. https://sloanreview.mit.edu/article/experiments-in-open- innovation-at-harvard-medical-school
Gulati, R., Wohlgezogen, F., & Zhelyazkov, P. 2012. The two facets of collaboration: Cooperation and coordination in strategic alliances. Academy of Management Annals, 6(1): pp. 531-583. https://doi.org/10.5465/19416520.2012.691646
Joho, H., Azzopardi, L. A., & Vanderbauwhede, W., 2010. A survey of patent users: an analysis of tasks, behavior, search functionality and system requirements. Proceedings of the third symposium on Information interaction in context. August: pp. 13-24. https://doi.org/10.1145/1840784.1840789
Krathwohl, D.R. & Smith, N. L., 2005. How to prepare a dissertation proposal: suggestions for students in education and the social and behavioral sciences, Syracuse University Press, Syracuse, NY, USA.
Mazzucato, M., 2018. Mission-oriented innovation policies: challenges and opportunities, Industrial and Corporate Change, 27(5): pp. 803-815. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dty034
Nature editorial, 2018. The best research is produced when researchers and communities work together, Nature, 562(7725): p. 7. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-018- 06855-7
Nature editorial, 2021. Research collaborations bring big rewards: the world needs more. Nature, 594: pp. 301-302. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-021-01581-z
Product Development Project, 2021, https://pdp.fi/ (accessed Nov 2021)
Pols, J., 2014. Knowing patients: turning patient knowledge into science, Science, Technology, & Human Values, 39(1): pp. 73-97. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243913504306
Punch, K.F., 2000. Developing Effective Research Proposals, Sage, London, UK.
Rappert, B., 1997. Users and social science research: policy, problems and possibilities. Sociological Research Online, 2(3): pp. 69-81. https://doi.org/10.5153/sro.109
Schauz, D., 2014. What is basic research? Insights from historical semantics, Minerva, 52(3): pp. 273-328. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-014-9255-0
Shrum, W., Chompalov, I., & Genuth, J., 2001. Trust, conflict and performance in scientific collaborations. Social Studies of Science, 31(5): pp. 681-730. https://doi.org/10.1177/030631201031005002
Stokes, D.E., 1997. Pasteur's quadrant: Basic science and technological innovation. Brookings Institution Press.
Swim, J. K., Fraser, J., & Geiger, N., 2014. Teaching the choir to sing: use of social science information to promote public discourse on climate change. Journal of Land Use & Environmental Law 30(1): pp. 91-117. https://www.jstor.org/stable/43741160
Tenopir, C., Allard, S., Douglass, K., Aydinoglu, A.U., Wu, L., Read, E., Manoff, M., & Frame, M., 2011. Data sharing by scientists: practices and perceptions, PLoS ONE, 6(6): pp. e21101. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0021101
Van De Gevel, J., van Etten, J., & Deterding, S., 2020. Citizen science breathes new life into participatory agricultural research. A review, Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 40(5): pp. 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-020-00636-1
Vicente-Saez, R., Gustafsson, R., & Martinez-Fuentes, C., 2021. Opening up science for a sustainable world: An expansive normative structure of open science in the digital era, Science and Public Policy (in print), pp. 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scab049
Wallis, J.C., Rolando, E., & Borgman, C.L., 2013. If we share data, will anyone use them? Data sharing and reuse in the long tail of science and technology, PLoS ONE, 8(7): pp. e67332. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0067332
Wareham, J., Priego, L. P., Romasanta, A. K., Mathiassen, T. W., Nordberg, M., & Tello, P. G., 2021. Systematizing serendipity for big science infrastructures: The ATTRACT project. Technovation (in press), pp. 102374. https://doi.org/10.101/j.technovation.2021.102374
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Susanne Beck, Janet Bercovitz, Carsten Bergenholtz, Tiare-Maria Brasseur, Pablo D’Este, Amelie Dorn, Michael Doser, Clio Dosi, Agnes Effert, Riold Furtuna, Melinda Goodyear, Christoph Grimpe, Fabian Hans, Carolin Haeussler, Barbara Heinisch, Nóra Katona, Harald Kleinberger-Pierer, Olga Kokshagina, Marcel LaFlamme, Cornelia Lawson, Patrick Lehner, Hila Lifshitz-Assaf, Wolfgang Lukas, Silvia Marchini, Markus Mitterhauser, Francesco Moscato, Markus Nordberg, Maria-Theresa Norn, Marion Poetz, Marisa Ponti, Gernot Pruschak, Janet Frances Rafner, Angelo Kenneth Romasanta, Alexander Ruser, Muhammed Sameed, Henry Sauermann, Julia Suess-Reyes, Christopher L. Tucci, Philipp Tuertscher, Rubén Vicente-Saez, Matteo Vignoli, Samantha Zyontz
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).