A survey on the content beliefs of professors teaching organic chemistry
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25321/prise.2021.1078Abstract
Background: The content beliefs of preservice chemistry teachers on the topic of organic chemistry were investigated; their content beliefs depend on their own school days. However, a survey on the content beliefs of their teachers at univer-sity was not conducted although those beliefs should influence the teaching at university. Purpose: The content beliefs of university professors on the topic organic chemistry should be investigated in order to gain insights on those beliefs. It can be assumed that those beliefs are fundamental for the organization of courses and lectures for students.
Sample/Setting: 271 professors (all professors teaching organic chemistry in Germany) were invited; 22.9 % participated, but only 18.8 % completed the questionnaire. Only these results were used for the discussion of the survey. Design
Methods: An online questionnaire was developed. This consisted of closed and open items on the topics and con-cepts of organic chemistry. The data of the questionnaire were transferred to SPSS. For the answers to the items that were rated with the Likert scale, frequencies were calculated. The answers to the open questions were summarized using the method of qualitative content analysis.
Results: Most topics were rated as being important for students at school or at university. Unfortunately, the concepts were rated less high than the topics. Whether this indicates that the professors focus more on topics than on concepts in their lectures should be investigated in another study.
Conclusions/Implications for classroom practice and future research: The use and importance of concepts on organic chemistry in teaching should be investigated.
Keywords: content beliefs, teacher education, organic chemistry
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 The Author/s
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/da2ab/da2ab4712fe8d3242bd41159e66e17423419d795" alt="Creative Commons License"
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal. The applicable licence is https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/, which means
You are free to:
Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material under the following terms:
Attribution: You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
NonCommercial: You may not use the material for commercial purposes.
ShareAlike: If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (see The Effect of Open Access).