Effects of senegal’s science and technology curriculum on the interest and self-concept of middle-school-students
Keywords:Science and technology, interest, self-concept
The present study aimed to explore the students’ middle-school interest for science and technology (S&T) but also the evolution of this interest while comparing two science and technology curriculum. In this study, the researchers collected data through a questionnaire on interest and self-concept in S&T. Four hundred and seventy-one middle-school students from general middle schools (known as “collèges d’enseignement moyen” [CEMs]) and specialized science and technology schools (known as “blocs scientifiques et technologiques” [BSTs]) in Dakar, Senegal responded to our questionnaire. Data analysis included a two-way repeated analysis of variance (ANOVA) measurement with time as a repeated factor and the group as a fixed factor. The results of the analysis of variance show that the interaction is significant for students’ interest in S&T at school. The simples effect interpretation shows that a significant difference (p = .002) between the levels of interest expressed in the pre-test and at the post-test by the BST group and the comparison of means shows that the BST group expresses scores of interests in the post-test that are lower than those expressed in the pre-test (M = -.260). Furthermore, the analysis of the results also shows a significant difference (p <.001) between the interest scores expressed in the pre-test and at the post-test by the CEM group. Contrary to what is observed with the BST group, the comparison of the means shows that the CEM group expresses a higher post-test interest compared to the pre-test (M = .596). The results show that the self-concept scores expressed by the BST group are therefore different from those expressed by the CEM group regardless of the time and in favour of the CEM group both in pretest (M = .36) and in the post-test (M = .46).
Background: Over the past few years, several international studies have addressed the issue of student interest in science and technology (S&T). The findings of these studies describe the phenomenon of declining interest the higher the level of education. Senegalese education system is not an exception to this rule. Several studies in that country refer to the factors that contributes to this decline.
Purpose: The present study aimed at exploring the effect of a special science and technology curriculum on students’ middle-school interest.
Sample/Setting: Stakeholders set consist of eleven experienced secondary science teachers (6 classes in each school). We asked them to teach as usual without changing their practice. We submitted a survey to their respective students to take measures of their interest at the beginning and at the ending of the session. The total sample size is of 471 students.
Design Methods: A pre-post comparison of student interest and self-concept scores was performed. A repeated-measure analysis of variance made possible to monitor the evolution of student interest and self-concept in the two curriculum cases (CEM and BST).
Results: The results suggest that the interest and the self-concept toward S&T expressed by CEMs’ students evolved positively. Interest expressed by students who have experienced the BSTs’ S&T curriculum has declined. This does not reflect the expected results from the beginning.
Conclusions/Implications for classroom practice and future research
Even though BSTs were intended to be an opportunity to teach science and technology under suitable conditions, it does not appear that science and technology courses are always provided as indicated when the initiative was created. Indeed, these conclusions suggest that we investigate the effect of the quality of S&T courses on student interest and self-concept.
Keywords: Science and Technology, Interest, Self-Concept
Ainley, M. et Ainley, J. (2011). Student engagement with science in early adolescence: The contribution of enjoyment to students’ continuing interest in learning about science. Contemporary Educational Psychology 36, 4-12.
Ainley, M., Hillman, K. et Hidi, S. (2002). Gender and interest processes in response to literary texts: situational and individual interest. Learning and Instruction, 12, 411-428.
ANSTS. (2003). Rapport général des ateliers préparatoires de la rentrée solennelle. Dakar : Académie National des Sciences et Techniques du Sénégal.
ANSTS. (2013). Situation de l'enseignement des sciences et de la technologie au Sénégal: États des lieux et perspectives. Dakar : Académie National des Sciences et Techniques du Sénégal.
Areepattamannil, S. (2012). Effects of Inquiry-Based Science Instruction on Science Achievement and Interest in Science: Evidence from Qatar. The Journal of Educational Research, 105, 134-146.
Bolshakova, V. L. J., Johnson, C. C. et Czerniak, C. M. (2011). “It depends on what science teacher you got”: urban science self-efficacy from teacher and student voices. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 6(4), 961-997.
Bong, M. et Skaalvik, E. M. (2003). Academic self-concept and self-efficacy: How different are they really? Educational psychology review, 15(1), 1-40.
Cheung, D. (2018). The key factors affecting students’ individual interest in school science lessons. International Journal of Science Education, 40(1), 1-23.
CNPDEST. (2010a). Programme indicatif national pour la rénovation de l'enseignement des sciences et de la technologie (PINREST): Du prescolaire au supérieur [National indicative program for science and technology education reform: From preschool to higher education] (Vol.2). Dakar : ministère de l'Éducation.
CNPDEST. (2010b). Programme indicatif nationalt pour la rénovation de l'enseignement des sciences et de la technologie. Principaux résultats du diagnostic et recommandations du terrain aux autorités et des autorités au terrain [National indicative program for science and technology education reform. Main findings from the evaluation and recommendations for and by authorities] (Vol.4). Dakar : ministère de l'Éducation.
CNREF. (1984). Rapport général et Annexes. Dakar : République du Sénégal.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. NJ Lawrence Earlbaum Associates, 2.
Cohen, J. (2013). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral. Sciences. Routledge.
Hasni, A. et Potvin, P. (2015). L'intérêt pour les sciences e la technologie à l'école. Résultats d'une enquête auprès d'élèves du primaire et du secondaire au Québec. Québec, Canada : CRIJEST.
Hidi, S. (2006). Interest: A unique motivational variable. Educational research review, 1, 69-82.
Hidi, S. et Harackiewicz, J. M. (2000). Motivating the Academically Unmotivated: A Critical Issue for the 21st Century. Review of Educational Research, 70(2), 151-179.
Hidi, S. et Renninger, K. A. (2006). The Four-Phase Model of Interest Development. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 111-127.
Hidi, S., Renninger, K. A. et Krapp, A. (2004). Interest, a motivational variable that combines affective and cognitive functioning. Motivation, emotion, and cognition: Integrative perspectives on intellectual functioning and development, 89-115.
Jocz, J. A., Zhai, J. et Tan, A. L. (2014). Inquiry learning in the Singaporean context: Factors affecting student interest in school science. International Journal of Science Education, 36(15), 2596-2618.
Khoo, S. T. et Ainley, J. (2005a). Attitudes, intentions and participation. LSAY Research Reports, 45.
Khoo, S. T. et Ainley, J. (2005b). Attitudes, intentions and participation.
Kloser, M. (2014). Identifying a Core Set of Science Teaching Practices: A Delphi Expert Panel Approach. Journal of Reseach in ScienceTeaching, 51(9), 1185-1217.
Krapp, A. (2007). An Educational–Psychological Conceptualisation of Interest. International Journal for Educational & Vocational Guidance, 7(1), 5-21.
Krapp, A. et Prenzel, M. (2011). Research on Interest in Science: Theories, methods, and findings. International Journal of Science Education, 33(1), 27-50. doi: 10.1080/09500693.2011.518645
MEN. (2009). Rapport d'enquête: Le mapping ou cartographie scolaire, une expérience sénégalaise [Survey report: School mapping, a Senegalese experiment]. Dakar : ministère de l'Éducation nationale.
MEN. (2014). Assises de l'Éducation du Sénégal: Rapport général [Senegal education conference: General report]. Dakar : ministère de l'Éducation nationale.
OECD. (2006). Evolution of student interest in science and technology studies (policy report). Paris : Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
OECD. (2008). Encouraging student interest in science and technology studies. Paris : Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
Renninger, K. A. et Suzanne, H. (2011). Revisiting the Conceptualization, Measurement, and Generation of Interest. Educational Psychologist, 46(3), 168-184.
Sane, A. (2009a). L’exemple de l’enseignement des sciences et de la technologie au Sénégal [An examination of science and technology education in Senegal]. Colloque 2009 : Un seul monde, une seule école ? Les modèles scolaires à l'épreuve de la mondialisation. Revue internationale d'éducation de Sèvres. Récupéré de http://ries.revues.org/5685
Sane, A. (2009b). Crucial choices facing science education in Senegal. Revue internationale d’éducation de Sèvres, 51, 67-77.
Schraw, G. et Lehman, S. (2001). Situational interest: A review of the literature and directions for future research. Educational Psychology Review, 13(1), 23-52.
Taskinen, P. H., Schütte, K. et Prenzel, M. (2013). Adolescents' motivation to select an academic science-related career: the role of school factors, individual interest, and science self-concept. Educational Research and Evaluation, 19(8), 717-733.
Copyright (c) 2020 The Author/s
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal. The applicable licence is https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/, which means
You are free to:
Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material under the following terms:
Attribution: You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
NonCommercial: You may not use the material for commercial purposes.
ShareAlike: If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (see The Effect of Open Access).